China’s Soybean Slaughter: A $14 Billion U.S. Commodity Wiped Out in 72 Hours—Is the Dollar Next?

In April 2025, a freight ship bring was rerouted mid-Pacific as China quickly canceled all soybean shipments, rerouting 2.4 million heaps to Brazil and removing $1.1 billion in U.S. farm agreements overnight. This wasn't a trade war– it was a computed demolition, with as the fuse. The move, timed with Trump's $90 billion on Chinese items, indicated a much deeper method to take apart U.S. farming dominance. By week's end, China protected Brazil's supply, backed by years of facilities financial investments, including $11.2 billion in ports and railways. U.S. farmers dealt with a 13% rise in unsold stocks, an 8.2% price drop, and an approximated 18% income cut, with 11 Midwest states at threat of insolvency. Brazil, with fewer regulations and trade defenses, is poised to provide 70% of China's soybean requirements, raising questions of long-term U.S. displacement. China's pivot wasn't almost soybeans– exports to China fell 29%, with Brazil securing a $2.6 billion deal. Formally, China mentioned phytosanitary issues, but no violations were verified, recommending a pretext for economic retaliation. With $8.3 billion purchased Latin American logistics, China manages 64% of its soybean import networks, reducing reliance on U.S.-controlled trade routes. This wasn't a trade conflict however a tension test, exposing U.S. vulnerabilities. As China signs long-lasting handle Brazil, Argentina, and others, covering 70% of its grain requirements, U.S. exports to China dropped 26% in Q1 2025. If soybeans were the first relocation, what's next– semiconductors, uncommon earths, or the dollar? This is an evidence of idea for a brand-new economic order, with international ramifications for markets, geopolitics, and power.

For Company or Copyright contact: topunderrated.channel( at) gmail( dot) com.

Disclaimer: Our content is based on facts, rumors, and fiction.

Comments

50 responses to “China’s Soybean Slaughter: A $14 Billion U.S. Commodity Wiped Out in 72 Hours—Is the Dollar Next?”

  1. @yayazein222 Avatar
    @yayazein222

    Is it possible that the soy is being rerouted to China from the US through Brazil? The same way China is still exporting through Vietnam.

    1. @railhammer Avatar
      @railhammer

      Yes. That’s how China avoided Trumps tariffs.

    2. @GlennMatheson-x3c Avatar
      @GlennMatheson-x3c

      If farmers are going broke, then it’s unlikely that they are simply avoiding the embargo by shipping from another country.

    3. @robertbolzicco9995 Avatar
      @robertbolzicco9995

      @@GlennMatheson-x3c thank you, someone with a brain answered.

    4. @Jocky8807 Avatar
      @Jocky8807

      The margin for electronic/garment/footware that goes thru vietnam is much higher than farm products (roughly 3-5%).

      The transportation and handling cost would eat up all the margin.

      Beside Brazil has opened up many hectares of new farm land to up their production. No need to buy from another country the way India reroute fuel from Russia thru EU. 🙏

    5. @billpugh58 Avatar
      @billpugh58

      go ask the farmers instead of pointless speculation🤣🤣

  2. @PrometheusCrom Avatar
    @PrometheusCrom

    I believe I read somewhere where when Trump tried to do this in his first term the Chinese made a deal with the Brazilians to invest in their agriculture.

    1. @Sterben_knight Avatar
      @Sterben_knight

      That is 100% correct, when he did that in his term he had the same mentality as right now. Thinking China would come to the table working a new deal but they pretty much said ” welp we dont wanna do that so we’ll just invest in another country to grow our stuff”

    2. @basook6116 Avatar
      @basook6116

      yes, and USDA had to bailout big US farmers, ect. costing US Govt. trillions

  3. @oundhakar Avatar
    @oundhakar

    I’m so sick of AI voiceovers. I don’t care about your accent, but please let’s have human narrators again.

    1. @nickloveridge3667 Avatar
      @nickloveridge3667

      100% agree. I can’t take any content seriously if it’s an AI voice.

    2. @MuzamilAbbasi-l5j Avatar
      @MuzamilAbbasi-l5j

      Dud its future 🎉

    3. @notjohnAtall Avatar
      @notjohnAtall

      This isnt AI though.

    4. @MuzamilAbbasi-l5j Avatar
      @MuzamilAbbasi-l5j

      @@notjohnAtall got it friend

    5. @tonytaskforce3465 Avatar
      @tonytaskforce3465

      @@notjohnAtall Doesn’t sound like it to me either. I think these people don’t like the message so they’re whining about the voice.

  4. @mirola73 Avatar
    @mirola73

    National black farmers union…………..damn, that’s racist.
    A farmer is a farmer, regardless of skin.
    What about ‘a farmers union’…………….no skin colour, no racism.

    1. @JimMerritt-cu9pd Avatar
      @JimMerritt-cu9pd

      Tell that to the black farmers that didn’t get bailouts during the last Trump administration. Do your homework.

    2. @PrometheusCrom Avatar
      @PrometheusCrom

      @@mirola73 don’t be uninformed.

    3. @deadnorth8333 Avatar
      @deadnorth8333

      Union for Farmers Republicans has been trying to destroy unions for years look what this administration just did to the federal employees firing them and negating the contract that was agreed upon

    4. @johnathannewburn2747 Avatar
      @johnathannewburn2747

      Farm bankruptcies were up 20% under Trumps first trade war with China, and 85% of the tarrifs collected went to Corperate Agriculture and large farms as subsidies and handouts There was a pecking order, and black farmers were at the end of the line when the money ran out.

  5. @ScottRex-q5i Avatar
    @ScottRex-q5i

    us farmers do not grow food anymore… they grow a commodity for export…. good gob maga

  6. @michaelpjeffries1521 Avatar
    @michaelpjeffries1521

    He was warned by people who are much much smarter than him. Tariffs are a consumption tax paid by consumers. Led to great depression. The protectionism runs deep in fascism. Nothing will get better. Until next administration.

    1. @CraigRoop Avatar
      @CraigRoop

      A potato is smarter than trump.

    2. @traian2041 Avatar
      @traian2041

      @@CraigRoop What does this say about the morons who voted for him? who after hearing what unhinged crap he spouted out at his rallies still voted for him? What do you think they are more but-hurt about now? This disaster, or those silly pronouns nobody should give a flying F about (they were a nice distraction though, especially since he and his cronies, made such a big fuss about the unimportant, idiotic, fad.)

    3. @Qorxuap Avatar
      @Qorxuap

      Please don’t compare potatoes to Trump. It makes potato look bad 😭​@@CraigRoop

  7. @eddiemartinez50 Avatar
    @eddiemartinez50

    Toda I heard a trumper say they are willing to pay higher prices just to support the tariffs but the same one complained about high prices during bidens administration?😂 but she fails to understand that not only will she pay much higher prices but the store shelves will soon be empty! These trumpers would jump off the cliff if asked them to 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    1. @Doz-13579 Avatar
      @Doz-13579

      Instead of hold the cliff upby hand, to help Biden stand longer😅😅

    2. @billpugh58 Avatar
      @billpugh58

      @@Doz-13579 huh? you speak english?

    3. @Nana-c1l8d Avatar
      @Nana-c1l8d

      I know..blind to whatever he says or does, follows him like sheep. In the next few weeks I think not only shelves will be empty but the cost will go near double,

    4. @Nana-c1l8d Avatar
      @Nana-c1l8d

      Who told him that..higher prices, in his dreams! He’s got no idea how the lower and middle class are making out since he took office only that he and MUSK FILLED THEIR POCKETS WITH BILLIONS.

  8. @steveward287 Avatar
    @steveward287

    This christmas US kids gonna get soyabeans as toys will be so expensive

  9. @Trueye-sl2mr Avatar
    @Trueye-sl2mr

    It is no longer economical to import US soya beans with the 125% tariffs. China has offered talks as soon as USA remove all its unilateral tariffs. 😁

    1. @Nana-c1l8d Avatar
      @Nana-c1l8d

      Thought it was 145% tariffs if coming from China

  10. @TroySilverfox Avatar
    @TroySilverfox

    Maybe the farmer should have thought about just growing corn, wheat, and soybeans. Plus, spraying tons of chemicals on them every year.

  11. @traceygrace7945 Avatar
    @traceygrace7945

    China started looking for other markets three years ago and been preparing for change since then. China may well take a short term hit but they’re just far too clever, organised and powerful to be blackmailed by the petulant man child. Just learned today too that the kitchen equipment – ovens, refrigerators, freezers etc have the lowest standards for the US market, because the FDA has the lowest food storage standards of almost anywhere! Coupled with the lowest standards for consumer safety, this should be of huge concern to US citizens as there is a real possibility that your government might got give a flying fart about you!

  12. @grantfrey3883 Avatar
    @grantfrey3883

    Corn, soy and wheat prices collapsed in Jan 2024. Too much global supply

  13. @dariushbozorg4312 Avatar
    @dariushbozorg4312

    US is becoming a third-world country! With declining of middle class , the US GDP, which is depends on middle class consumptions will decrease! Americans won’t have to be able to consume as they did before. The first they will cut is unnecessary costs like travelling, buy cars, fridge or own. They save for groceries! I bet Vitnames will have a better economy than Americans before 2045.

    1. @kraigisboss Avatar
      @kraigisboss

      Not only that but half of what the US inports from China are what is know as input goods IE stuff sold to Factories and assembly plants and not to the average consumer which will likely slash the US’s already low factory output [China is about 36% of the worlds factory output and the US is around 16%]

  14. @peterelliott2914 Avatar
    @peterelliott2914

    Left the important part till last in this video. China has not only been preparing with Brazilian soy for years (and Russian grains), also tech, energy, minerals and money (including gold). They got Trump covered.

  15. @shiulai5804 Avatar
    @shiulai5804

    Assume there is no global glut, American farmers can sell their soybeans to the markets that Brazil has vacated due to sales to China
    Has it been done? If not, why not?

    1. @waynegazard5038 Avatar
      @waynegazard5038

      A large market would be Europe, unfortunately some won’t accept G M food others require stringent testing and regulations just don’t accept crap food and standards like Americans are expected to

    2. @Rubicon365 Avatar
      @Rubicon365

      Because US pissed everyone! Who would want to trade with a bully?

  16. @rubyannr6898 Avatar
    @rubyannr6898

    China said take it the WTO. 😂😂😂 reverse Uno

  17. @wilsonkw831 Avatar
    @wilsonkw831

    American vote for it!

  18. @Sunflyer46 Avatar
    @Sunflyer46

    This is what happens when you depend on foreign governments for exports and imports!! Farmers should be growing for American consumers

    1. @tonytaskforce3465 Avatar
      @tonytaskforce3465

      Yes. American farmers: “Give me a handout or give me death!” Seems like Socialism is back with a vengeance.

    2. @glorianyambok7405 Avatar
      @glorianyambok7405

      @Sunflyer46 The US produces more Soybeans than it can consume. The US only needs about 50% of Soy production. Maybe you are right that farmers should stop growing Soybeans. The challenge is that the US will lose that revenue revenue either way. China is the biggest Soybean market in the world. They buy 66% of the world’s production..

    3. @Rubicon365 Avatar
      @Rubicon365

      Because trade make you rich! Simple economics

  19. @ByronRobinson-n3n Avatar
    @ByronRobinson-n3n

    China has been looking for other trade partners since his first term so they are well prepared

  20. @syntheticbone Avatar
    @syntheticbone

    Farmers voted Trump,now, suffer, zero sympathy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *