Best EV Car – New Electric Car Reviews

A Wagoneer Worth Waiting For? | 2024 Jeep Wagoneer S

Jeep is understood for a variety of things however electrical automobiles have not been one of them,; previously. Though it took it's time bringing a BEV to North America it appears that Jeep wasn't sitting on it's hands or phoning it in with the Wagoneer S (even if the name does not appear quite best). Though it presently is available in a single trim this Jeep is rated at 303 miles of EPA range, 600hp, 0-60 in 3.4 seconds, has AWD, and with the tires as equipped returns some pretty impressive fuel effectiveness numbers. All of that and an interior and exterior that would be what you anticipate from a higher tier Jeep item.

#jeep #wagoneer #wagoneers #jeepwagoneers #electricjeep # 4xe # #dualmotor #awd #mcintosh #suv #bev

Tax Credits Explained:
The Mountain Garden:

Buy Merch!
Follow us on Facebook:

00:00 Exterior Walk Around
09:16 Interior Tour
17:05 Out on the Road
29:56 Last Ideas

Posted

in

by

EVCarNew

Tags:

, , , , , , , ,

Comments

44 responses to “A Wagoneer Worth Waiting For? | 2024 Jeep Wagoneer S”

  1. @uutube243 Avatar
    @uutube243

    Awesome another EV that will lose 50% of the msrp within two months. Go ask for ford lightning owners how there making out lol most owe 90k and their work maybe 40k if that. Stop the insanity unless theee golf carts are $15,000. Msrp you’re throwing all your money in the trash.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      If a concern of EV ownership is resale value than leasing is probably the way to go. -Travis

      Reply
    2. @joetacchino4470 Avatar
      @joetacchino4470

      You had a point until you called it a golf cart.

      It isn’t a golf cart chief.

      Reply
  2. @nicksgarage2 Avatar
    @nicksgarage2

    This should have been a Chrysler or a Dodge. I assume it’s a 2024 Jeep in 2025 to help with their 2024 fuel economy ratings averages but that seems like cheating.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      I think it fits where it is alright, not sure what they would have needed to do if it went to another brand. -Travis

      Reply
  3. @anthonyc8499 Avatar
    @anthonyc8499

    We need an AWD Jeep Avenger with 70kWh pack for $40k.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      We might get something like that down the line but not in short order. -Travis

      Reply
    2. @anthonyc8499 Avatar
      @anthonyc8499

      @@EVBuyersGuide It’s the dream! When BP Pulse opens the new station out in Troutdale, be sure to check it out.

      Reply
  4. @davidws5439 Avatar
    @davidws5439

    Jeep, put the charge port in the correct position, but did not go with the NACS connector. Who wants to buy a new 2025 ev with an OUTDATED CCS1 connector. It would have been perfect since they don’t have many evs out in North America to go with NACS at the beginning.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      There are going to be more ’25 models with CCS than NACS/J3400. -Travis

      Reply
    2. @DuesenbergJ Avatar
      @DuesenbergJ

      @@EVBuyersGuidestill a new car with a dying charging standard. It will be a frustration for owners.

      Reply
    3. @gregpochet4812 Avatar
      @gregpochet4812

      Doesn’t matter if you have NACS or CCS right now. Either one, you will need an adapter.

      Reply
    4. @davidws5439 Avatar
      @davidws5439

      @gregpochet4812  Not true. The supercharger network has been great to get around for many years and only getting better. Also, most of the new networks installed have about 40% NACS connectors and 60% of the old outdated CCS1 connector that is very heavy and hard to use. The worst thing is buying CCS1 EVSE’S and any V to L or V to G equipment. Not many will buy a brand new 2025 vehicle with an outdated connector. The change to NACS for North America was done over 18 months ago and manufacturers had time to change just like Hyundai group is doing.

      Reply
    5. @hlothr Avatar
      @hlothr

      It’s not outdated. Jeep has access to thousands of public ccs stations and does not have Tesla access. You would be using an adapter all the time if it had nacs.

      Reply
  5. @NikolasAlvanos Avatar
    @NikolasAlvanos

    It’s definitely swag-oneer gents

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      Ooooo, interesting take that we hadn’t considered. -Travis

      Reply
  6. @jaytaylor629 Avatar
    @jaytaylor629

    Alex, NO ONE needs a passenger screen. It’s a feature that nobody asked for that these manufacturers have added because us consumers are stupid enough to pay the outrageous prices that these cars cost because of these tacky features. If I wanted crazy features, I’d buy a Rolls-Royce or Maybach.

    Reply
  7. @dhuffman690 Avatar
    @dhuffman690

    Long-term reliability will still be a question here, especially on a brand-new platform

    Reply
    1. @BoopsieR5 Avatar
      @BoopsieR5

      Long term reliability is a question on all Jeep products regardless of platform maturity.

      Reply
    2. @gnumel Avatar
      @gnumel

      @@BoopsieR5 that said, these platforms are for use in europe in the French cars. Not the large specifically I think (unless it’s in the 5008) , but most of the same components.
      Soooo…. Fingers crossed.

      Reply
  8. @itslucien Avatar
    @itslucien

    The dashboard looks so much like the Q8 just with an extra screen, and that car is already over 5 years old.

    Reply
  9. @robertbarnett6010 Avatar
    @robertbarnett6010

    lost me at its a POS ill just keep my MPY

    Reply
  10. @james2042 Avatar
    @james2042

    This should have been a chrysler. It would have solved two problems the company has, chrysler has no suv crossover, and chrysler only has one model. All they needed to do was call this an aspen and use it as a sign of “chryslers premium future” and try and sell the brand as a premium/entry luxury brand like it tried to be in the 80s. They’d have the unique position of having absolutely no company framework or vision to work with as their only model is a minivan. A free clean sheet design opportunity.

    But instead they brand this a wagoneer and throw away the model. This wont sell well and it will just tarnish the jeep name further. Lets just hope now that tavares is gone, they can start making good decisions with the chrysler brands

    Reply
    1. @GlitterGuru Avatar
      @GlitterGuru

      Chrysler did have a version of this, the Airflow, that was canceled. IMO Chrysler should buy out Canoos IP and make a range of ev minivans, returning back to their minivan roots.

      Reply
    2. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      I can’t imagine Canoo has much worth buying, otherwise they probably would have done better. -Travis

      Reply
    3. @GlitterGuru Avatar
      @GlitterGuru

      @@EVBuyersGuide maybe. That strategy would be interesting for Chrysler though; a complete range of different vans – minivan, truck, utility, offroad…

      Reply
  11. @stephanlauriston7736 Avatar
    @stephanlauriston7736

    It’s swagoneer

    Reply
  12. @robertd2486 Avatar
    @robertd2486

    Another $70k EV that no one wants or asked for, if you want people to buy an EV, it has to come in around $30-$40k

    Reply
  13. @joetacchino4470 Avatar
    @joetacchino4470

    I don’t know which is more indicative of what Jeep is smoking…the price, or that roof wing.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      You don’t like the wing? -Travis

      Reply
  14. @godofdun Avatar
    @godofdun

    The Lyriq/ZDX comparison seems the most apt. Is the ev route planning decent? That’s pretty important.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      In our testing, no, it wasn’t. -Travis

      Reply
    2. @godofdun Avatar
      @godofdun

      @EVBuyersGuide  oof, unfortunate. Preconditioning for fast charging?

      Reply
    3. @AAutoBuyersGuide Avatar
      @AAutoBuyersGuide

      @@godofdun it does precondition, but not specifically for charging. This is pretty common as most EVS will attempt to maintain a specific battery temperature for general use and nothing additional is needed to hit their charge curve.

      Reply
    4. @godofdun Avatar
      @godofdun

      @@AAutoBuyersGuide good to know that, thanks!

      Reply
  15. @TechnicallyJeff Avatar
    @TechnicallyJeff

    I do like the Wagoneer S, BUT FCA reliability is awful. My Pacifica PHEV has had so many issues over the last few years. Hopefully this ends up being solid.

    Reply
  16. @timkline162 Avatar
    @timkline162

    I like it, not holding my breath but I’m hoping they will make the jeep Recon EV more affordable.

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      This Wagoneer will come in more affordable trims down the road but I also expect the next Jeep BEV we see to be built for a different price point; a lower one. -Travis

      Reply
    2. @timkline162 Avatar
      @timkline162

      @@EVBuyersGuide That would be great, they really need to lower their prices.. for all jeeps. It’s not a luxury brand even though Stelantis wanted it to be

      Reply
  17. @Zzzz99599 Avatar
    @Zzzz99599

    What a fail. An expensive beast that has no headroom. If it shares anything with the ePacifica it’s gonna be a nightmare

    Reply
    1. @EVBuyersGuide Avatar
      @EVBuyersGuide

      Not NO headroom, and I say that as the one who didn’t fit. It’s more and more common to have shorter rooflines and there are 3 row SUVs that I don’t have enough headroom in. Just trying to keep things in perspective. -Travis

      Reply
  18. @laloajuria4678 Avatar
    @laloajuria4678

    for anyone dumb enough to want a jeep product, this would be an excellent option actually.

    Reply
    1. @dvader3263 Avatar
      @dvader3263

      Says the person watching a 33 minute video on a Jeep EV.

      Reply
  19. @kipamore Avatar
    @kipamore

    Nobody ever wants to give Chrysler any credit. Assuming it’s relatively reliable, this thing is a hit. It’s as expensive or less expensive than the most gussied up gas Cherokees. It’s as fast or faster than the much more expensive Lyriq V, and appears to be comparably comfortable and luxo. It’s faster than a Trackhawk and more equipped but cheaper. At 74k, it compares VERY favorably with it’s competition, although I’m not exactly sure what that competition is other than price. You can actually spec a Gladiator or Wrangler up to close to that price, and I think it’s safe to say you are getting more for money here than in a Gladiator. To be honest, the only thing holding me back from buying this is the upcoming Recon, the RamCharger, and the fact that I can get a used Lyriq or Lightning in the low 30s.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *