What is that? 🤔
by
Tags:
Comments
41 responses to “What is that? 🤔”
-
Ich danke Ihnen für Ihre Stimme. Die Welt braucht mehr mutige Menschen🐱
-
“What is that?”
A typical AMG shitbox
-
That is a joke that’s what it is.
-
The engine or the short?
-
@Preston P. the engine.
-
-
A disgrace to the C63 name
-
Would it still be if they put an inline 6 into it like the E53?
-
@Snake EyesC63= 6.3/6.3 liter V8. The original C63 was iconic for it’s engine
-
@Redmi Note 9 63 was 6.2l so they started cheating right from the beginning 😂
-
@Snake Eyes Yes, anything with a 63 badge should at least be a V8. While the 4L bi-turbo V8 is not a 6.2, it is still a great engine and a V8. Especially when the SL55, which is a number 8 smaller than 63, has a V8 in it. Absolutely inexcusable.
-
-
AMG engine builders going from V8s to four bangers…
-
Petition to make carwow do YT shorts car reviews separate to the actual video (new content) instead of these cropped out videos being put on a regular video. And link the full review in the short so you gain 2 sets of views (potentially). You will be able to show just how cool your transitions are.
-
If the V8 was already problematic, imagine this MF… 😂😂😂
-
I can tell you for free, my AMG45s was the worst car I’ve ever owned. The person who built the engine on mine must have been drunk as it kept breaking down.
-
No way 😭😂
-
Really? In Germany the used car prices for A45s are astronomic because they are so popular.
-
That’s to be expected. Waaaay too much boost for a 4-cylinder to handle.
-
@TheBreakfastLoveryou’ve obviously never heard of turbo hondas then😂
-
@nZoot name a production Honda engine with more boost than the C63’s 4-cylinder
-
-
Please stop with these lame shorts. This isn’t tik tok
-
I agree
-
-
The clients wants more fuel economy with the performance. That’s the result
-
Doesn’t it also have a lot to do with CO2 regulations?
-
AMG owners giving two shits about fuel economy, sure bud 😂
-
I doubt any Amg owner ever said: “ i wish this C63s had a 4 cycl hybrid motor instead of a bi-turbo v8”….
-
GermaNaz- I mean Europe and its ridiculous emition restrictions. Thats the result
-
The -clients- _government_ wants more fuel economy with the performance. That’s the result
ftfy
-
-
The 680 hp are also a lie. The car is a little bit faster than M3 xDrive with 510 hp and way slower than M3 CS with 550 hp. So you have approxiemately 540 hp with the 2+ tons weight. That’s impressive for a 4 cylinder but with real 680 hp the car must destroy a M5 CS, RS7 Competition or a GT63 S.
-
Not here to argue but this is F1 technology and those cars have a 1.6L V6 pulling alone almost 840 HP approx. without the electric motor the adds 160HP!!!! Now the 2.0 L is the same principal complicated technology to create a lot of power out of a smaller engine! So my friend I don’t think is a lie!
-
@A MitchellBro. F1 weighs a few hundred kilos. This thing 2 tons. You dont jUST put the technology that was meant for LIGHT vehicles in a tank. Double stupidity pointy for the team that developed this hot trash.
-
-
I was just saying the same thing about those nails!! 😂😂
-
The crossed eyes and those teeth!!😁
-
-
And they made the new m5 ugly…. Good times are coming to a end
-
There’s this timeless mystery, how do ladies with those long fingernails go to the loo on long calls… 📞
-
It’s a C23 AMG now
-
I can say the same seeing those Edward Scissorhands nails 😅
-
I heard merc were dropping this because they’re struggling to get them to work properly and bringing back the v8.
-
Okay so it’s lost HALF of it’s turbos 😢 HALF of engine capacity 😢 HALF of it’s cylinders 😢and HALF of it’s noise 😢😢😢😢😢
-
But costs more
-
-
For the amount of work you put into in the factory, you now get two engines from a single bi-turbo V8. This is what you call “stonks”!
-
It’s a disgrace what Mercedes has been doing the last 5 years…
Leave a Reply