New Audi E7X Review: 680hp for under £40k!

Is the brand new Chinese Audi E7X much better than the German Audi Q8?

Get 20% off Automobile Vertical utilizing code Carwow:

Mat's got his hands on the all-new Audi E7X.

However, this is no common Audi! It's been developed solely for the Chinese market, so we won't see it on sale in the UK, Europe or the U.S.A.! But why is that?

Audi is aware that those aiming to acquire a cars and truck in China are a lot more likely to purchase something that is home-grown, instead of a German export. As an outcome, the E7X is a joint endeavor between Audi and SAIC, with Audi's conventional four-ring logo dropped in favour of capitalised AUDI lettering rather.

The question is, what else has changed? Let's take a better look …

Beginning with the style, although the size is relatively comparable to an Audi Q8, there is almost absolutely nothing else that distinguishes it as an Audi. Whereas all German producers' cars and trucks will follow some of the same design cues, if you were to eliminate the AUDI badging from the front and rear, you 'd be hard-pressed to understand what the brand was! Still, up front it looks contemporary and futuristic, with thin headlights and a wraparound loop style that features Matrix LED lights. Along the side, the similarity to the Q8 is more noticeable, although the surface areas of the panels are smooth (comparable to an iX3), and around the back the design is reasonably clean and similar in look & feel to the front end.

Step inside, and it's a comparable story to the outside – the design is totally various to what you would find in a German-built Audi. The main feature you'll observe is a long screen that extends throughout the whole dash, with a traveler screen also developed into it. The infotainment system is relatively quick and easy to use, but thankfully, the environment controls are changed independently with physical buttons! Somewhere else, the cabin is covered in soft-touch products, consisting of an Alcantara-effect roof lining, and the seats are incredibly comfy.

For those in the back, there's likewise a substantial amount of space, with reclinable seats, leg rests, and a 27-inch retractable screen! There are also large, sturdy tables developed into the back of each of the front seats.

The Audi E7X includes two motors that combine to produce 680hp and 800Nm. So it's adept, but then again, being electrical, it tips the scales at a significant 2,600 kg. It comes with a 100kWh battery, which benefits a claimed series of around 400 miles.

The E7X is on sale in China at an incredibly low cost, beginning with simply ₤ 36,360! That's less than half the rate of a similar-sized Audi Q8 from Germany. The question is, if this cars and truck were on sale in the UK, would you choose it over a Q8? Let us understand in the remarks!

Explore brand-new and used cars and truck handle Carwow:

Chapters
00:00 Audi E7X Preview: Coolest & Most Irritating Features
01:13 Drag Race: Audi E7X vs Audi Q8
02:26 Emergency Brake Test (100– 0 km/h).
03:00 Exterior Style Walkaround & Lighting Signature.
03:56 Interior Quality, Screens & Cabin Tech.
05:29 Public Reactions: Audi Without Four Rings.
06:36 Back Seats, Legroom & Guest Comfort.
07:52 Boot Capability & Practicality Test.
10:19 5 Annoying Features You Must Know.
12:24 5 Coolest Functions on the Audi E7X.
13:33 Audi E7X Price.
14:53 Driving Impressions & Efficiency.

Comments

81 responses to “New Audi E7X Review: 680hp for under £40k!”

  1. @pennydome Avatar
    @pennydome

    680 hp, 800 Nm, 400 miles of range and half the price of a Q8. Suddenly “made exclusively for China” sounds less like a strategy and more like Europe being protected from an existential crisis.

    1. @nicalev Avatar
      @nicalev

      Bot..

    2. @giulioiodice2114 Avatar
      @giulioiodice2114

      half the prize because you have half the cost in china (less taxes , electricity cost nothing ), in europe they pay fines for Co2 (in china they did not do this crap ) , will never do 400 miles if not as a city car

    3. @JohnCena-um5uo Avatar
      @JohnCena-um5uo

      16$ per hour & 35hour week vs 2$ per hour 70 hour week

    4. @andrecardoso6941 Avatar
      @andrecardoso6941

      You people have no idea how economics work lol if you want europe to compete with these prices then you should have no problem working 80h per week and making 1/10 of what you make now?

    5. @Gazthegandalf Avatar
      @Gazthegandalf

      There are no private companies in China. The Government owns them all, even though it presents things a different way.
      Remember Jack Ma of Alibaba fame? He spoke negatives about the economy and has been missing from the Media for 5 years.
      As long as you grease palms, and make China look like is ‘bigger, better, bolder’ in anything – then you’ll get Tax Breaks and Bonuses.
      That’s why there are acres of rotting EV Cars in China.
      The got their Bonuses … proved China produces more EV’s than anyone else … then Parked them up so slowly rot and deposit their chemicals back into the land.

  2. @SupportVehiclePete Avatar
    @SupportVehiclePete

    That price difference is outrageous!

    1. @andrecardoso6941 Avatar
      @andrecardoso6941

      of course it is. In China you are forced to work 70h per week while you make 1/3 or less of what people in europe make.

    2. @SupportVehiclePete Avatar
      @SupportVehiclePete

      ​@andrecardoso6941 I’ve seen enough Reddit videos of artisan Chinese items to recognise prop. The reality of life is very different there vs Europe. But that doesn’t take away from how cheap the car is in comparison.

      It’s not like someone in the UK pulling an extra shift on a 4 on 4 off 12 hour shift on minimum is going be able to afford a Q7.

      Tbh I hope the influx of Chinese makes & models in the UK forces some of the western manufacturers to make things more affordable.

    3. @I_THE_ME Avatar
      @I_THE_ME

      ​@andrecardoso6941Also, the raw materials are produced by companies that are often state backed and these companies have very lax safety and environmental regulations.

    4. @jamesli2040 Avatar
      @jamesli2040

      @andrecardoso6941 more like your country tax everything like no tomorrow and even double down on top of that for import goods 😂

  3. @GavinBond-q2l Avatar
    @GavinBond-q2l

    You know China have gone clear when European car makers need to start launching sub-brands just to compete over there. 🤣

    1. @andrecardoso6941 Avatar
      @andrecardoso6941

      lol nobody who can afford an Audi is going to buy that shitty chinese car.

    2. @hamzaHrv Avatar
      @hamzaHrv

      China with its local EV grants have forced everybody to start making cars there. Its a dirty tactic that I predict will backfire eventually

    3. @wavhutaliramadi2885 Avatar
      @wavhutaliramadi2885

      You do know that Audi has been making Chinese spec cars for a while right?

    4. @Vuxchen Avatar
      @Vuxchen

      @andrecardoso6941 lol calling it “shitty chinese car” while the chinese Audi is literally better than the german one in lots of aspects 💀

    5. @boxtears Avatar
      @boxtears

      @hamzaHrv No one forced anyone, they could’ve just said no.

  4. @m.f.4414 Avatar
    @m.f.4414

    2:10 Who would have thought that a car with 400 more horsepower is actually faster… 😊

    1. @krashina4496 Avatar
      @krashina4496

      Such a stupid comparison… Who would have guessed that outcome. 🙄

    2. @actionman1276 Avatar
      @actionman1276

      Prize and interior!!

    3. @CrackOnYaDick Avatar
      @CrackOnYaDick

      The guy is a banger..

  5. @iPpBG Avatar
    @iPpBG

    China getting the premium models while Europe gets the pleb models

    1. @mewn9754 Avatar
      @mewn9754

      The companies making the car are preserving the ICE market in Europe, and the important labour protections means we are operating in a two-speed global market, reinforced by protectionism in China among others.

    2. @s7ventude Avatar
      @s7ventude

      Yup

    3. @JohnSmith-pn2vl Avatar
      @JohnSmith-pn2vl

      europe is not buying audi either, they lost 90% 4 years ago, porsche was the last one but now even Porsche is in the red, german car industry is defacto dead

    4. @gentle285 Avatar
      @gentle285

      This is just a slightly modified IM LS7 from BAIC.

    5. @janrdoh Avatar
      @janrdoh

      If you watch the whole review Mat does say the refinement and drive is not “premium”, so while it may be good enough for those of us who have never experienced premium, it is not for those who have.

  6. @TeoStan Avatar
    @TeoStan

    In this test, it would have been great to see the Q8 e-tron compared to this Chinese version of Audi.

    1. @rongyaowang1075 Avatar
      @rongyaowang1075

      This Audi model! It was entirely built by Chinese engineers! It completely imitates the configuration and styling of Chinese car brands! So, various car companies borrow from each other’s products! At this point, those cynical people! Are they silent now? Have they become normal?😂🤔

    2. @madmeister407 Avatar
      @madmeister407

      The Q8 e-tron would have wiped the floor with this Carwow sponsored propaganda Chinese shite.

    3. @Kuraanu Avatar
      @Kuraanu

      ​@madmeister407 if it’s this bad, you should expose it.

  7. @markmitterhuber Avatar
    @markmitterhuber

    It is not banned from Europe. Audi decided to launch it only in China.

    1. @IYKYK-UK Avatar
      @IYKYK-UK

      Just clickbait, they know.

    2. @dpmoos3225 Avatar
      @dpmoos3225

      its bascially banned. Try to import one and get it serviced. Good luck.

    3. @dzonikg Avatar
      @dzonikg

      They likely losing money on this car but need to stay up in the game,price is very aggressive even for china ,like it cost 20% less then similar cars from Neo or Xpeng

    4. @markmitterhuber Avatar
      @markmitterhuber

      @dpmoos3225 But it is not banned by the government or what so ever. If Audi would like to export this car, they can. But they want to keep this car in China.

    5. @captives6479 Avatar
      @captives6479

      SAIC decided to launch it, not Audi. ‘AUDI’ is a Chinese brand. The European Audi is the one with four rings.

  8. @digitalassetguy7468 Avatar
    @digitalassetguy7468

    Europe has surrendered without a shot fired

    1. @ifitsnotscottishitsshite Avatar
      @ifitsnotscottishitsshite

      The EU is just amazing, we don’t have vans now because of the new co2 100g per tun regulation

    2. @user-mo3sz7io5f Avatar
      @user-mo3sz7io5f

      Woke always goes broke.

    3. @Kaanooo Avatar
      @Kaanooo

      @user-mo3sz7io5f stupid comment

    4. @d947 Avatar
      @d947

      GO WOKE GO BROKE

    5. @dzonikg28 Avatar
      @dzonikg28

      Well this how they actually fighting, only who stay in Chines market and stay in the game there will survive. Which for US makers would mean only Tesla

  9. @gumanikja0522 Avatar
    @gumanikja0522

    Matt doing boot test as if he wants to kidnap someone🤣

  10. @watataka0000 Avatar
    @watataka0000

    the sunroof takes longer to dim because it’s electrochromic and actually blocks light, heat etc. the ones that take just a second to dim are PDLCs that don’t perform nearly as well.

    1. @rongyaowang1075 Avatar
      @rongyaowang1075

      This Audi model! It was entirely built by Chinese engineers! It completely imitates the configuration and styling of Chinese car brands! So, various car companies borrow from each other’s products! At this point, those cynical people! Are they silent now? Have they become normal?😂🤔

    2. @Superzesh101 Avatar
      @Superzesh101

      Glad somebody said this. 😅

  11. @cipi5475 Avatar
    @cipi5475

    So Audi can make screens without huge bezels!

    1. @k0walsk Avatar
      @k0walsk

      Loool those bezels are so terrible. Stylistic nonsense that does not look good nor improve any functionality. The new chief of design will do much better in that regard I believe

    2. @littlsuprstr Avatar
      @littlsuprstr

      Notice how it doesn’t have a ridiculous and massive grille either.

    3. @dannyboycar0777 Avatar
      @dannyboycar0777

      No, it’s not Audi. It’s chinese SAIC car with Audi logo. Audi can only make shtty bezels with garbage software 🙂

    4. @bzilla-d4i Avatar
      @bzilla-d4i

      Audi does not build the screens themselves, thought people would be smart enough to at least know that. Carmakers rarely build their own screens, usually built by Samsung, LG etc

    5. @Steve6851-d6l Avatar
      @Steve6851-d6l

      seriously!!😂

  12. @cybersrs2777 Avatar
    @cybersrs2777

    It doesn’t let you fold down the back seat because you need to move the front seat forward first, but it does let you break your feet.

  13. @Machines.In.Action Avatar
    @Machines.In.Action

    £36k vs £80k makes you understand why Audi had to rethink its strategy in China! 💸

    1. @JohnSmith-pn2vl Avatar
      @JohnSmith-pn2vl

      typical carwow brain right here.
      ROFL
      bro wtf
      THIS IS NOT TRUE OBVIOUSLY

    2. @gentle285 Avatar
      @gentle285

      This is just a slightly modified IM LS7 from BAIC.

    3. @StarPantsss Avatar
      @StarPantsss

      @gentle285 It looks very different, and better, in and out compared to the 2023 LS7. It is a quite extensively upgraded LS7, new Continental and ZF air suspension, new computers, new electric motors, new styling.

    4. @leiho3814 Avatar
      @leiho3814

      chinese shill

  14. @Stop_Pre-Ordering_Video_Games Avatar
    @Stop_Pre-Ordering_Video_Games

    £36,000 is absolutely shocking! We are royally being bent over in Europe

    1. @gentle285 Avatar
      @gentle285

      1.: This is just a slightly modified chinese IM LS7 built by BAIC. That’s why it’s cheap.
      2.: When European cars entered the chinese market, they were forced to create joint ventures with their automakers. Over the years they’ve “stolen” all the know-how from European and US brands and now they’re using the cheap labor and huge government funding to invade foreign markets destroying their economy in the process.

    2. @tomasg4623 Avatar
      @tomasg4623

      ​@gentle285 half of this isn’t even true. Can you bring up sources for how much of this car’s price is subsidised by chinese government?

    3. @user-mo3sz7io5f Avatar
      @user-mo3sz7io5f

      I just bought a tesla model 3 premium AWD for $52k CAD plus tax which is like 28k pounds. You can get a regular range one for 22k pounds . UK is in the gutter.

    4. @liuziyu8487 Avatar
      @liuziyu8487

      @gentle285 Larper comment, you cannot even distinguish the difference between SAIC and BAIC, BAIC never built any VAG group cars and actually built Mercedes. Second, VAG willingly built cars as jointly ventures back in 1980s that Audi even built a Audi 100 with Chrysler engine just for the sake to be the first of major import/CKD brands in China

    5. @EMPERORAFRO Avatar
      @EMPERORAFRO

      try america

  15. @キイムくん18 Avatar
    @キイムくん18

    6:30 if they know the cars price , monthly gas price , electric charging price and Maintenance fee etc

  16. @ramikhudair Avatar
    @ramikhudair

    “I think you should 69 it” 😂

  17. @lockettlv Avatar
    @lockettlv

    For everyone confused, this is not the Audi we know, its a separate, China-exclusive EV sub-brand. That said, its ridicilous honestley

    1. @brunopinheiro2632 Avatar
      @brunopinheiro2632

      Honestly, I can’t bring myself to like a single one of those appliances on wheels! Calling a battery-powered contraption on wheels a “car” is a real insult. Back in the day, they were called wagons when pulled by horses, and then they became “cars” once they got combustion engines! That gave cars a soul and a sense of emotion! Today, you can call these electric things whatever you want, but they aren’t cars; they’re a different mode of transportation—but they aren’t cars. Period. Besides, these new modes of transport aren’t beautiful, they lack personality, and they’ve turned into disposable objects—just like cell phones.

    2. @MTF-Epsilon-11-SCPF Avatar
      @MTF-Epsilon-11-SCPF

      ​@brunopinheiro2632 some of the first cars were electric, mate, and this is like calling a new electric high-speed train not a train because it doesn’t have a diesel or steam engine

  18. @dancinggorilla7 Avatar
    @dancinggorilla7

    Literally companies aren’t even hiding it nowadays, so they can sell cars so cheaply in china but to us Europeans/British we are severely overcharged! Yeah cheers!

    1. @Kaanooo Avatar
      @Kaanooo

      thats just not true

    2. @MuhammadvHussain Avatar
      @MuhammadvHussain

      That’s due to the European Union. Look at the Toyota Corolla. Brand new, it’s like 20k USD in the USA. But in Europe? Same options costs 35-40k USD or more.

    3. @MTF-Epsilon-11-SCPF Avatar
      @MTF-Epsilon-11-SCPF

      im pretty sure labour is cheap there

  19. @falcongamer58 Avatar
    @falcongamer58

    8:30 devious timing

  20. @adicbn Avatar
    @adicbn

    £36k for that car, it’s insane how ripped out we are in Europe by these brands

    1. @Kaanooo Avatar
      @Kaanooo

      what are you talking about? We are not ripped out by these brands in europe

    2. @dzonikg28 Avatar
      @dzonikg28

      Days off car CEOs doing sht and living milioner life , fcking young girls on their yahts are over soon

    3. @BenelliMr Avatar
      @BenelliMr

      by …. ??? by whom? Who puts the outrageous taxes on our cars?

    4. @Channel-h4b Avatar
      @Channel-h4b

      You’re a total dimwit.

      Forced labor and state-imposed slave factories in China heavily center on state-mandated labor transfer programs targeting ethnic and religious minorities, alongside isolated criminal networks exploiting vulnerable populations. According to the United Nations Human Rights Office (OHCHR), these practices feature coercive elements so severe that they amount to enslavement and are a crime against humanity.

      State-Imposed Forced Labor

      The Chinese government operates systematic poverty alleviation and vocational training schemes that international experts identify as cover for state-sponsored forced labor.

      Targeted Demographics:

      Programs explicitly target Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and Tibetans.The “Labor Transfer” Mechanism: Authorities forcibly move thousands of individuals from the Xinjiang and Tibet regions to industrial zones hundreds of miles away.Factory Conditions: Transferred laborers often work under heavy surveillance, live in segregated dormitories, face restrictions on movement, and undergo mandatory political indoctrination. They face arbitrary detention if they refuse to participate.Affected Global Supply ChainsMany consumer goods found worldwide are tied to factories utilizing forced minority labor.

      A report by the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre noted that dozens of major global brands have faced scrutiny over raw materials or manufacturing links to these facilities. Heavily impacted sectors include:Textiles and Garments: Cotton production, footwear, and fast-fashion manufacturing, Automotive and Metallurgy: Aluminum-intensive auto parts, chassis components, and engine blocks.Green Energy: Solar-grade polysilicon used globally for solar panels.Electronics: Component assembly for computers, smartphones, and consumer tech.

      Private Sector and Criminal Exploitation

      Outside of state-run programs, domestic human rights abuses occur via illegal local manufacturing rings:Brick Kilns and Mines: Investigations have exposed local corrupt officials colluding with brick kiln and mine owners to force children, internal migrants, and individuals with mental disabilities to work without pay under physical threat.Exploitative “996”

      Culture: Distinct from literal slavery, the mainstream tech and manufacturing sectors frequently leverage the illegal 996 working hour system (9 a.m. to 9 p.m., 6 days a week), resulting in extreme physical exhaustion and worker exploitation.International Regulatory ResponsesGovernments have passed strict trade laws to block these products. For example, the United States enforces the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which bans goods originating from Xinjiang unless companies provide clear proof that no forced labor was used. Various international bodies routinely add implicated Chinese textile, seafood, and metal companies to trade restriction entity lists to enforce supply chain transparency.

    5. @abejacobs6345 Avatar
      @abejacobs6345

      Guess who’s paying the difference? We are TARFU in Europe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *