Is the Bugatti Tourbillon quicker than the Chiron? π
by
Tags:
Comments
44 responses to “Is the Bugatti Tourbillon quicker than the Chiron? π”
-
So the answer is YES π
-
Of course it is
-
No speculation, no scale modelling, it is unclear at this moment
-
Cant wait for the 500kmh+ version
-
I donβt understand why they immediately didnβt do a 500 version or one that is closer to 500. The new Tourbillon can do 445 which is a top speed we have seen from countless other Hyper cars
-
Tourbillon Super Sport β€β€
-
@@emiel255bc of the tyres
-
@@makr0295 yeah but why canβt they fit tires that are able to handle those kinda top speeds? I mean the Chiron super sport 300+ was already able to hit 489km so why canβt they fit those tires on there from the get go?
-
β@@emiel255 they limit the top speed to 445km/hr for production car. They will probably test its true top speed once it’s released.
-
-
Δ°f it werenβt faster they wouldnβt share it
-
Are the tailpipes real though?
-
Ye
-
β@@falcon2898Stick of truth never lies
-
-
Ok that new speedometer like a clock is actually a good idea. π
-
Hence, the name “Tourbillion.”
-
Bugatti also made watches so it could be inspired from their watch’s design
-
When it breaks they’ll charge you the equivalent of what rolex charges to fix clocks π
-
β@@CanisoGaming so? The people that own such cars don’t care about maintenance price.
-
@@Jax-795you mean Jacob and co built watches that mimic Bugattis cars design language
-
-
The old one is doing it for real, the new one is just a simulation
-
yeah the 1800hp hybrid is faking it for sure
-
@@imavanasear is not fake, but is a computer simulation which does not include traction issue, climate, wind and other things.
It’s fast for sure, but not that fast.
-
It will probably be since it’s hybridβ@@champsdesigner
-
β @@champsdesignerI think they included the resisting forces. You can see that the acceleration gets slower with increasing speed.
-
@@Accoun6.02 with computer.
-
-
One thing to note here is that the engine of the Tourbillon without the actual body that’s doing all of this. If the engine was mounted to the car and the car is run on a dyno, it would be slower than displayed. Otherwise, we weren’t told the conditions at which the engine was tested.
-
What I love the most about the Tourbillon is that they lowered the weight of the car compared to the Chiron, despite the electric motors, batteries and such.
-
Who noticed the movement of the fuel guage as it declines with speed as wellπ
-
Battery charge.
-
Thatβs the battery charge
-
Empty in 4minute
-
If you talking about the top one it’s because the camera angle changes
-
-
9k revving v16 ππ₯΅π₯΅
-
Naturally aspirated π€€
-
9.5k rpm π
-
-
Old Is Gold
-
Shocking: A car is slower than the better version of that car
-
Animated vs real tho
-
That clock combining the speedometer and tachometer is stunning!
-
It’s like the laws of physics are different with this car π Incredible how it keeps accelerating. It’s kind of also a setting of your gears, so I do wonder if the pull would be the same on a higher speed run.
-
it can accelerate as much as it wants as the engine is being revved in Cosworths machine, it’s not actually in the car yet
-
-
That integrated RPM meter is cheif’s kiss i mean Engineer’s kiss
-
Gorgeous new dials aside, Iβm slightly suspicious that the Chiron vid was done on a road/track/runway, while the Tourbillon one might have been done with the car on a rolling road or in a similar drag-free environment. Still bloody quick, though, and canβt wait to see it in action!
-
I think the Tourbillon video isnβt real but an animation matched with the engine sound from the dyno to give a preview of what to expect.
-
Leave a Reply