Germany 
vs Italy 
BRAKE TEST!
by
Comments
40 responses to “Germany vs Italy BRAKE TEST!”
-
At least you hear the Ferrari from far away so you have enough time to jump out of the way or drive off again
-
This goes to show how much better brakes have gotten over the years
-
-
I think we knew who would win that without watching.
-
Mat hit the brakes earlier
-
-
One car is way more recent then the other, that’s the reason
-
But the other car is a limited run track car
-
@huryphe that needs the breakes to be at temperature to work properly.
Testing cold carbon ceramic brakes is kinda wrong.
-
@@ViniciusConsortedoesnt audi also use carbon ceramic brakes?
-
@arifemre0109I think they’re optional, but yeah not sure if this model had them or not. Also if both are fitted with CCs, one driver could have used them more previous to this and got them a bit more into their temp range. Or could come down to tires, both model and age/wear.
-
@arifemre0109 im not sure of that car setup, afaik they can be Carbon Ceramic or not, its optional, looking at S7 brakes for sale there are rotors made of steel and Carbon Ceramic.
-
-
Audi has the largest braking system ever installed in a production car (440mm ceramic disc, 10 piston calipers) and a much newer ABS system.
-
-
ABS improvements could definitely help though I don’t think larger rotors or calipers would necessarily as this is just one emergency stop and not an extended track day where thermal capacity or even pad wear is a concern.
-
That’s not the reason
-
Porsche is better
-
-
Ze German efficiency mein gut Herr.
-
It’s guter
-
-
The reason is:Matt hit the brakes earlier .
-
The Ferrari use ceramic carbon brakes you will warm them up to first
-
Audi too, I think
-
@Benito0421 it’s add on option
-
bravo, that’s exactly what it’s all about, you need to warm up the brakes to get their maximum with a ferrari
-
@@oilposionthats rs7 performance ceramic brakes comes stock
-
The ferraris brakes aren’t warm enough
-
-
*You know it’s serious when both countries bring their A-game… and their brakes!
Who knew racing could be* -
Maybe the Audi has better weight distribution, if more weight is in the rear, it gives more traction to the rear wheels and better stopping force when summing up all 4 wheels
-
I’d think the mid engine Ferrari has a more advantageous weight distribution, usually those are just a touch rear biased whereas I don’t believe any front engine Audis even get close to 50:50 FR.
-
@ on quattro models the weight distribution is 55:45 (F:R).
If the model is a hybrid as well, the battery would go under the cargo compartment floor (battery could be 35kg and go as high as 100kg), giving it a bigger rear ratio
However, specs are not mentioned in the short. -
@@bojangjoreski1260 I don’t believe the S7 or RS7 are a full hybrid so with that front weight bias I’d think the weight distribution advantage would be towards the Ferrari.
-
-
Maybe the Tyres with which the Ferrari is equipped are old and the ABS of the Audi is a little bit more sensitive on the grip limit.
-
I bet those carbon ceramics on the ferrari were cold
-
That’s why you see so many wrecked Ferraris in London
-
Of course the breaks are good, you dont want to crash while going 300+km/h in the german autobahn.
-
The only reason is، he was late in the brake test.. he is not sam or yanni or your usual friends on that channel knowing when to brake.
-
THE REASON IS GERMAN ENGINEERING !!!!!! PERIOD
-
Brakes aren’t equally heated. Ferrari is lighter so brakes would take longer to heat up
-
Usually, heavier cars brake worse
Mass and aerodynamics (only at high speed) makes more friction, wich is good for braking
But more mass is more inertia and that is usually a lot worse for braking
I think the difference is in the brakes, but I do not know exactly what could be
-
anyone that’s ever driven in Italy knows Italians don’t like to brake.
Leave a Reply