Best EV Car – New Electric Car Reviews

Porsche’s New 6-STROKE Engine Just Saved Internal Combustion!

Modification your car with Carwow:

Some of the most significant cars and truck producers in the world have actually been working on technology that might help save the !

From to Toyota and even , several producers have been checking out new methods to guarantee that the internal combustion engine does not cease to exist as more policies are generated over the next couple of years. But what sort of innovation have they been working on?

Well, among the most amazing innovations comes from , with patents for a brand new fuel engine having been uncovered! There's an entire load of technical information included with the patents, but this all-new style appears like it will help to radically increase power thanks to there being two power strokes in every three revolutions. With this in mind, not just is power increased, but it suggests that emissions will likewise reduce at the exact same time.

However that's not all, both and Toyota have unveiled patents and teased tech that makes use of hydrogen fuel. For example, patents reveal that is carrying out deal with a supercar that would Consist of a hydrogen-powered internal combustion engine!

Plainly, development of this remains in the really early phases at the minute, however there are fantastic benefits to be had with hydrogen fuel, generally being the reality that no co2 is expelled from the car at all, so it's a real game-changer when it concerns lowering emissions! The only issue is that you might have difficulty discovering a place to refuel if the contemporary network is anything to pass …

But what do you think – could Porsche's brand-new patents assist in saving the internal combustion engine? Let us know in the comments!

Posted

in

by

EVCarNew

Tags:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

62 responses to “Porsche’s New 6-STROKE Engine Just Saved Internal Combustion!”

  1. @carwow Avatar
    @carwow

    Change your car with Carwow: https://bit.ly/-Change-Your-Car-1410

    Reply
    1. @benlecluyse Avatar
      @benlecluyse

      Hell yeah !!

      Reply
    2. @Future-Classic-Cars Avatar
      @Future-Classic-Cars

      Podcast podcast podcast view our future Classic Cars podcast wohaaaaaaaaaaay 😅😢😂

      Reply
    3. @Future-Classic-Cars Avatar
      @Future-Classic-Cars

      ​@@benlecluysePodcast podcast podcast view our future Classic Cars podcast wohaaaaaaaaaaay 😅😢😂

      Reply
    4. @manilove2pwn Avatar
      @manilove2pwn

      terrible content

      Reply
    5. @Future-Classic-Cars Avatar
      @Future-Classic-Cars

      @@manilove2pwn All advertising is good advertising 👏 thanks for your response.

      Reply
  2. @keloduma Avatar
    @keloduma

    All I see is maintenance hell

    Reply
    1. @1InVader1 Avatar
      @1InVader1

      EVs are so simple by comparison it makes them look lucrative.

      Reply
    2. @lowrideza Avatar
      @lowrideza

      Tru😢

      Reply
    3. @ronniemartinez8034 Avatar
      @ronniemartinez8034

      Well, it’s either that, or go fully electric. 🤷

      Reply
    4. @MonicaHolly143 Avatar
      @MonicaHolly143

      Too nuch for you then

      Reply
  3. @NikesZ28 Avatar
    @NikesZ28

    Sounds like an engine replacement when it breaks 😆

    Reply
    1. @bh4560 Avatar
      @bh4560

      I was thinking the same. Very complicated..😮 I’m sure they will test it’s durability though.

      Reply
    2. @Matt_10203 Avatar
      @Matt_10203

      I mean a lot of engines are already replacements when they break. Regardless I trust Porsche engineers more than internet opinions, if they think it’s viable then I’ll trust them – they’ve not given any reason to doubt them so far.

      Reply
  4. @user-sl5bh8kr8h Avatar
    @user-sl5bh8kr8h

    All that pushing, squeezing and banging reminds me of my college days ? She was called Porsche’a too 😂😅

    Reply
    1. @JimmyTRUELOVE Avatar
      @JimmyTRUELOVE

      I am 12 and this is funny

      Reply
    2. @Jess-h4y Avatar
      @Jess-h4y

      It’s. Suck squeeze bang blow.

      Reply
    3. @Jojo-o6o6w Avatar
      @Jojo-o6o6w

      ugh so lame

      Reply
    4. @mikiasyimer1791 Avatar
      @mikiasyimer1791

      W comment

      Reply
    5. @user-sl5bh8kr8h Avatar
      @user-sl5bh8kr8h

      @@Jojo-o6o6w ugh so Woke

      Reply
  5. @E30Sawyer Avatar
    @E30Sawyer

    The Porsche engine is a 4-stroke then 2-stroke engine. Must make a wicked sound! Would love to see the torque curve.

    Reply
    1. @georgestam1710 Avatar
      @georgestam1710

      My thought was exactly like that. Can’t wait to hear it ❤

      Reply
    2. @TapasSahoo97 Avatar
      @TapasSahoo97

      During 4 stroke rich fuel mix and during 2 stroke super rich fuel mix…ECU will goo crazy to handle this😂

      Reply
    3. @E30Sawyer Avatar
      @E30Sawyer

      @@TapasSahoo97 The CAT won’t be happy, but maybe the EGR can go, as technically the new strokes.. use.. the.. exhaust?? 😅

      Reply
    4. @TapasSahoo97 Avatar
      @TapasSahoo97

      @@E30Sawyer yes…after the first power stroke not all the exhaust will go out as some will be used in the next one…but after the 2nd one all exhaust will go to the turbos….then how the turbos will sound …..seems interesting 😁

      Reply
    5. @mdaamer7495 Avatar
      @mdaamer7495

      ​@@TapasSahoo97i think so Porsche will design different fuel injection system to manage it much better or else this can mess up things. Especially in the long term.

      Reply
  6. @EVinstructor Avatar
    @EVinstructor

    Toyota tried with hydrogen combustion. They’ve gone some way to solving the problems of the extremely high temperatures hydrogen burns at.

    However, the size of fuel tanks presents a problem. Hydrogen is extremely energy dense. A kilogram of hydrogen holds loads more energy than a kilogram of petrol. But a kilogram of petrol fits in a litre jug. A kilogram of hydrogen gas takes up a lot of of space, 0.082Kg per cubic metre. It’s like comparing a kilogram of feathers to a kilogram of lead.

    In the Mirai fuel cell car they compress the hydrogen to 750 bar, 10,000 psi, and fill 3 enormous fuel tanks. It gets about 350 miles range. A Mirai is over 5 meters long with the internal space of a Fiesta because they’re so big.

    An ICE engine is about half as efficient as a fuel cell so needs tanks twice the size. This means in a small hatchback there would only be room for a drivers seat.

    To try and improve this Toyota used liquid hydrogen in the Corolla hydrogen ICE race car. Liquid hydrogen is very difficult to store. It has to be kept below its -253 degrees C boiling point. As a consequence it keeps boiling off and very explosive hydrogen gas has to be vented out of the tank. The inevitable happened with the Corolla, it caught fire.

    Hydrogen is a very difficult gas to store, transport and contain in a tank for use in a car. Car manufacturers have been trying to use it since the 1970s. Oil companies love it because they currently make nearly all of it in very dirty carbon intensive processes. They can keep the business model of making motorists go to fuel stations and charging lots of money for fuel.

    Hydrogen combustion doesn’t seem to be on the road to being a mainstream fuel.

    Reply
    1. @Southghost5997 Avatar
      @Southghost5997

      Unfortunately, most people gloss over all of this. Worse still, car manufacturers know this.

      Reply
    2. @EVinstructor Avatar
      @EVinstructor

      @@Southghost5997 BMW know all about it when they tried to use hydrogen for ICE cars with the Hydrogen 7 a couple of decades ago. They constantly vented hydrogen gas as the liquid boiled. Couldn’t put them in an enclosed garage- boom.

      Reply
    3. @doejohn8674 Avatar
      @doejohn8674

      @@EVinstructor Yep, I remember visiting the BMW booth at the IAA in Frankfurt in the eighties and talked to the guys showing the 750i with hydrogen engine…

      Reply
    4. @psykology9299 Avatar
      @psykology9299

      Until we can get the electrolysis of water happening efficiently we wont have hydrogen ice, its the only way we get hydrogen ice because im sure im not the only person who doesnt feel comfortable driving around surrounded by hydrogen tanks

      Reply
    5. @GBOAC Avatar
      @GBOAC

      Another big problem with combusting hydrogen in a piston engine is NOx emissions, just like with diesel. Then you’re not exactly zero emission like everything is transitioning to.

      Reply
  7. @dusebup Avatar
    @dusebup

    “Porsche Just Saved Internal Combustion for RICH PEOPLE who can AFFORD one of their vehicles” should be the title.

    Reply
    1. @psykology9299 Avatar
      @psykology9299

      Not really, if the engine works itll find its way into consumer targeted vehicles

      Reply
    2. @WindHaze10 Avatar
      @WindHaze10

      @@psykology9299 only IF they allow more reasonable manufacturers like Toyota, Hyundai or Škoda to use that patent.

      Reply
    3. @aleksjenner677 Avatar
      @aleksjenner677

      @@psykology9299 Not if Porsche doesn’t license the patent to budget automakers

      Reply
    4. @shadxwslash44 Avatar
      @shadxwslash44

      @@aleksjenner677 Far be it from Porsche to stand in the way of progress.

      Reply
    5. @Jojo-o6o6w Avatar
      @Jojo-o6o6w

      I fail to understand how that is going to save internal combustion engines for porche

      Reply
  8. @sirr_will Avatar
    @sirr_will

    Matt went HARD on the inuendos💀

    Reply
  9. @bazurful Avatar
    @bazurful

    “stroke” of genius.

    Reply
  10. @R33C3. Avatar
    @R33C3.

    Carwow more vids like this pls real informative break downs on how things work.

    Reply
  11. @geoffb3240 Avatar
    @geoffb3240

    That 6-stroke is ‘just’ a 4-stroke bracketing a 2-stroke. Amazed that it can be cleaner than a conventional 4.

    Reply
    1. @Matt_10203 Avatar
      @Matt_10203

      It’s cleaner and makes more power than a 4 stroke. Still not as much power as a 2 stroke but it’s around 25% more power than a 4 stroke.

      Reply
    2. @aarong9378 Avatar
      @aarong9378

      Cadillac thought their 8-6-4 system of the 1980s would be cleaner, too. In the real world, it was an emissions nightmare.

      Reply
    3. @EBMproductions1 Avatar
      @EBMproductions1

      ​@@aarong9378porsche is not cadillac though. 😂

      Reply
    4. @siraff4461 Avatar
      @siraff4461

      Thats not how it works though because the second combustion event takes place before teh first one is exhausted. That means the first event is almost emissions free at the exhaust so you’re getting one and a half power strokes for the emissions of one and a 10th.
      That not only means less emissions per volume but also more power meaning there is less volume needed in the first place.

      Reply
  12. @coolmus1 Avatar
    @coolmus1

    The 6 stroke Porsche engine looks like a 4 stroke and 2 stroke engine combined. It’d create lots more power but not sure how it’d be more efficient? The 2 stroke part of the cycle would bring down efficiency vs a regular 4 stroke.

    Reply
    1. @Matt_10203 Avatar
      @Matt_10203

      Because you’re scavenging energy by pulling in gases from the first combustion stroke and re igniting them. More power and cleaner.

      Reply
    2. @JMNTN Avatar
      @JMNTN

      They don’t say it’s more efficient, it can make more power and reduce emissions. Reducing emissions has nothing to do with fuel economy it’s about how clean the fuel is burned. (See dieselgate, vw made their diesels more efficient by letting them pollute more.) This system will basically act like an EGR system but instead of sending exhaust back in the intake it does it during the 2 extra strokes, added benefit is you have more power strokes.

      Reply
    3. @james64ibm Avatar
      @james64ibm

      If Porsche is indeed intending to put that into a production car it will actually be better.
      I too am rather sceptical of the concept, but I ain’t gonna doubt Porsche if they decide to have a go at it.

      Reply
  13. @davdep Avatar
    @davdep

    That’s going to sound like a backfirng vacum cleaner😂

    Reply
    1. @michaelschneider- Avatar
      @michaelschneider-

      A vintage Kirby vacuum..

      Reply
    2. @siraff4461 Avatar
      @siraff4461

      Its going to sound like a normal four stroke at lower rpm so when this is at 1500rpm it will likely sound like a normal one at 1000rpm.
      Remember there is no exhaust between the combustion events so you’re going to have one exhaust pulse per 6 strokes instead of 4.

      Reply
  14. @andrew86fl Avatar
    @andrew86fl

    Essentially, Porsche designed a 4stroke plus 2stroke engine. Will it run on 50:1 mix fuel?

    Reply
  15. @dazmorland Avatar
    @dazmorland

    As soon as I heard scavenger port, I was sold. So basically a 2 stroke engine married with a 4 stroke engine! Literally a stroke (pardon the pun) of genius!

    Reply
  16. @momovuyisich8945 Avatar
    @momovuyisich8945

    Reminds me of all the cool innovations in film cameras in the early 2000s. We all know how that story ended.

    Reply
    1. @siraff4461 Avatar
      @siraff4461

      Yawn. Let me know when the ev equivalent to an ice can hold 1000x time data on something a 100th the size – or be that much more useful in any way whatsoever.
      Honestly you people are amazing with these nonsense lines – all while ignoring that battery density has done almost nothing in the last 10 years even with the kind of international investment that could start a small countries’ economy.

      Reply
  17. @HF-sy3dg Avatar
    @HF-sy3dg

    Matt’s eyes are focused elsewhere and not the camera.

    Reply
    1. @TorrellesEdit Avatar
      @TorrellesEdit

      Classic prompter reading behaviour

      Reply
  18. @wandilentshangase2204 Avatar
    @wandilentshangase2204

    Thanks for keeping us updated

    Reply
  19. @supakul.4487 Avatar
    @supakul.4487

    that zoomed in face in combination with the teleprompter is pure comedy 😀

    Reply
  20. @cervelo9465 Avatar
    @cervelo9465

    It is all very complicated indeed .. so well done Mat for getting your head around it and explaining it .. successfully.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *