At one place, Pricing seems to be 57c/kWh for non-Tesla and 24c/kWh Tesla. Prices vary from place and time. But we can assume Tesla doesn’t subside charging for Non-Tesla, so that providing charging at 57c/kWh is around what is profitable for Tesla for running a SuperCharger site.
A huge step in the right direction. I hope this precedes a new Supercharger cabinet design with a more “ambidextrous” cable layout to allow easier access for non-Teslas, since I see this being rather chaotic with how short Tesla cables are.
I’m surprised they’re doing this so comparatively early, but it’s great. More competition benefits the customer and EV adoption and brand-exclusive charging networks don’t. Wonder which price they will charge.
Here is the official Tesla text about this:
https://www.tesla.com/en_EU/support/non-tesla-supercharging
I feel like the line about not blocking stalls if the cord doesn’t reach will be quickly ignored.
At one place, Pricing seems to be 57c/kWh for non-Tesla and 24c/kWh Tesla. Prices vary from place and time. But we can assume Tesla doesn’t subside charging for Non-Tesla, so that providing charging at 57c/kWh is around what is profitable for Tesla for running a SuperCharger site.
A huge step in the right direction. I hope this precedes a new Supercharger cabinet design with a more “ambidextrous” cable layout to allow easier access for non-Teslas, since I see this being rather chaotic with how short Tesla cables are.
Good. Now, I would like to know how they charging their non-Tesla users.
I’m surprised they’re doing this so comparatively early, but it’s great. More competition benefits the customer and EV adoption and brand-exclusive charging networks don’t. Wonder which price they will charge.
Game over for IONITY it looks like.
Or it will be only used for Audi and Porsche cars.
Wonder what the car manufacturers behind IONITY will do now with their 0,80 € rate